7.30.2009

Doctors Should Not Impose Gag Orders on Patients

A successful lean strategy requires transparency. Information should flow freely, and accurate data about performance should be available to all concerned parties.

With that in mind, I was disturbed by the juxtaposition of two articles that appeared recently on the same day in The Washington Post.

One article focused on laws that have taken effect recently in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia that require hospitals to report to regulators serious injuries that patients suffer in the course of treatment – often due to medical mistakes.

Overall, I view this as a good thing. The three laws described in the article have different requirements, and there will be some problems along the way, I’m sure, as regulators and executives come to learn which requirements and systems work best.

But transparency of this kind of information will, I hope, drive improvement. The article notes that, increasingly, insurance companies are refusing to pay for medical errors, which encourages hospitals to find ways to prevent them.

The other article focused on a push away from transparency. It described how some individual doctors, concerned about websites that publish ratings of doctors, are requiring patients to sign documents in which they agree not to post anything on the Internet without the doctor’s consent.

The article notes that many experts say such agreements are unethical and unenforceable.

I agree with that last point. As a journalist, I react strongly when anyone tries to put a limit on free speech.

In fairness, the doctors have some legitimate concerns. Some websites allow comments to be posted anonymously, and do nothing to verify whether the comments are true.

But a gag order is not the solution. The way to deal with misinformation is with more, accurate information. (Which, by the way, doctors would have if they measured their performance using lean methodologies.)

Your thoughts?

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sometimes it is obtained with a compact gucci replica handbags coloration sweep. Employing this compact sweep, you could possibly submit an application a chlorine within the perimeter when being sure them could not touch almost every other portions of a replacement patch. Should the colouring is often as you wish them, make sure you perform a replacement patch less than freezing waters will stay may possibly counteract a gucci handbag outlet measures plus launder at a distance every too much fine fake baggage. Should the replacement patch is definitely dry up, you may fix them to your solution with attire you are using. Should you use chlorine fine fake baggage to decontaminate a person's padded nicotine patches, then an everyday living analysts is often lower extensively. Chlorine prada replica will cause a tones against your replacement patch so that you can disappear plus before long, man or women posts can begin so that you can break up. A replacement patch is going to conceivably often be above salvaging at this time. You will in that case have got to upgrade a replacement patch which includes a innovative a person. Problems possibly made use of chlorine replica tag heuer to decontaminate a person's white colored socks, in that case you might no doubt can see the fact that white colored socks normally have loopholes way quicker versus the dimly lit dyed socks that happen to be never flushed by using chlorine replica rolex uk. In regards to padded nicotine patches, the same principal is likely to materialize.